Mclaren_Mircea_1984

BOOOOOOOMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!! https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mercedes-fia-oil-burn-limit-946538/ The FIA has confirmed that Mercedes will be allowed to run its latest engine at a higher level of oil burn for the remainder of the season, following the German manufacturer’s move to introduce it at the Belgian Grand Prix. With a new oil burn limit of 0.9 litres per 100km coming into force at the Italian Grand Prix, Mercedes pre-empted that cut-off point by bringing its fourth and final power unit into play in Belgium last weekend. According to an FIA technical directive issued by the FIA in July, engines introduced before Monza would be allowed to run at an oil burn level of 1.2 litres per 100km. However, there was subsequently some confusion about whether the ruling on the limits was superseded by a separate regulation that states customer units have to be at the same specification as the works outfits. –– ADVERTISEMENT –– If that was the case, then it was suggested Mercedes would have to comply with the 0.9l limit when its customers moved on to their final engine. But ahead of the Italian Grand Prix, the FIA has confirmed that Mercedes will only have to comply with the 1.2l limit that was laid down in the technical directive – because the engine has already been used. The ruling does mean, however, that when Mercedes customer teams introduce their final units, they will have to run it at the 0.9L level. An FIA spokesman said: “If an engine (ICE element) is introduced at or after the Monza race weekend, its oil consumption needs to be below 0.9L/100km whenever it is used. If an engine (ICE element) has been introduced at or before the Spa race weekend, its oil consumption needs to be below 1.2L/100km whenever it is used.” The FIA deems that has engine has been used as soon as a car’s timing transponder has been triggered by leaving the pitlane. The Mercedes move to bring its final engine to Spa was understood to have caused some unease at Ferrari, because the Italian outfit had not been expecting anyone to bring new engines for that weekend. Furthermore, it also means the Maranello outfit will have to run its new engine – when it comes – at the 0.9 litres per 100km limit. The issue of oil burn had become a talking point in Belgium, but Mercedes boss Toto Wolff made it clear he was happy to speak to Ferrari about the matter if there was anything they were unhappy about. “We are fierce competitors and the relationship we have is that we stick our heads together if there is a problem, and we discuss it behind closed doors,” he said, when asked by Motorsport.com about the oil burn situation. “It hasn’t come up. We need to be careful that things are not made up in the public that are just not right, and not true. So far, I’m easy about it.”

Dar nu are legatura Auto Motor un Sport, publicatia originala germana, cu Dan Alexandrescu sau cu alta publicatie romana. Nu nici o colaborare si nici o conexiune. Pe mine ma distra la maxim Dan Alexandrescu, cat ne tot inebunea cu Doru Sechelariu. In continuu doar cu Doru Sechelariu, ce face Doru, cat de bun e doru, cum a mancat paste cu Kubica Doru. In cursa vorbea dpar de Doru Sechelariu. Doru Sechelariu e cel mai bun pilot dupa el. P.S Nu stiam si nu am auzit de pitstop.ro, o sa intru si eu pe el.

@Serban Uite chiar acuma am gasit pe AMuS articol nou, unde am gasit atat despre chestiunea legata de motor, ce zice Andy Cowell si ce zice Wolff legat de setarea aero pt Spa. Mercedes Motorschef Andy Cowell confirmed: "For us, the 0.9-liter limit is the same as for all others. The engine was designed for this purpose. So it was in a Technical Directive of the FIA ​​of July. And so we have always interpreted this rule. "Wolff adds:" There was a lot of excitement about nothing. The rumor that we wanted to fool Ferrari is nonsense. " Vettel also had to fight with more air resistance as he pulled out of the wind shadow of the silver arrow. Because Ferrari had trimmed his car to more downforce. "We deliberately opted for a race set-up with more topspeed and two tenths of roundness," Wolff admitted. So you were not vulnerable to Ferrari on the straights. Also as Vettel again had DRS and Hamilton did not. Sursa: http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/formel-1/mercedes-besiegt-ferrari-in-belgien-12486609.html Ador articolele si analizele dupa cursa AMus. Mereu stiu cele mai multe si mai obiective informatii, si sunt foarte obiectivi, cateodata ma si revolt cum naiba tot pe Ferrari i-au vazut mai rapizi si in Spania si in Canadaa desi Ham a castigat. Dar judecand la rece: they are the best. Daca stii putin germana te descurci cu mici erori ce le da translate google. Sky, Hughes, Brundle, desi sunt putin subiectivi anti ferrari, mi se par oricum sub AMUS.

@Serban Andrew Showlin au spus ca au luat dupa FP3 din nivelul de apasare aerodinamica constienti ca oricum le ramane suficient cat sa ia pole-ul. Aceasi tip de apasare aero i-ar fi facut sa piarda mai mult pe S2 si la uzura si gestiunea pneurilor, dar stiau ca vorf face cel putin 30 de tururi pe soft deci o mare problema nu va fi, exceptand blistering sau ceva neprevazut. Din calculele lor cel mai vulnerabil moment va fi Kemmel straight, daca Vettel iese lipit de el in T1 se tine aproape de el prin Eau Rouge si va trece pe Kemmel. Am vazut si asa in primul tur cu toata puterea Mercedes si aripa mai low downforce, a fost cat pe aici aproape roata la roata, Lewis tinand interiorul. Eu nu cred ca Mercedes sunt favoriti la Monza. La Spa sunt curbe, dar la Monza sunt cateva zone de tractiune unde Ferrari e KING cum s-ar zice. Ma tem. Eu nu sunt atat de pesimist pentru celelalte curcuite, exceptand celor 2 stradale Singapore si Abu Dhabi. Pe Mercedes o avantajeaza nu doar liniile drepte ci si virajele de mare viteza, cu Maggots si Beckets, Cops, ii ajuta extra stabilitatea rezultata din conceptul embrinar al monopostului cu ampatament marit, si stabilitatea mai mare rezultata. Daca nu sunt probleme cu performanta motorolui, la stadiul in care sunt acum cele doua masini, daca Ferrari nu dezvolta mai mult in continuare si Malaezia si Japonia si Mexic si Usa favorizeaza Mercedes. Sunt destule zone de fuga si circuitele nu sunt cu denivelari, viraje lente, stranse, bumpy, twisty cum s-ar zice. In Brazilia va fi usor avantajata Ferrari, iar pe Abu Dhabi si Singapore Mercedes va fi zdrobita. Gandestete doar la zona aceea pe Cota sau cele doua mari linii drepte lungi din Malaezia legate intre ele doar de un viraj.

@ serban M-ai speriat la faza cu faptul ca motorul e construit pentru consumul de 1.2 in loc de 0.9. Sper sa nu fie adevarat, deoarece oricum Force India si Williams ar fi trebuit sa se incadreze in limitele de 0.9 deci o problema structurala grava care sa handicapeze Mercedes nu prea are cum fi. Cel putin nu in cursa. In calificari s-ar putea ca Mercedes sa piarda ceva, ai dreptate datorită acestui lucru, dar daca nu pierd decat o zecime sau doua nu va fi problema. Ceva, ceva avantaj si in calificari tot va ramane. La Spa, Mercede sau spus ca au folosit mai putina apasare aerodinamica pentru a se putea apara si ataca pe liniile drepte, si ca daca ar fi mers cu ceva mai multa apasare aerodinamica, la nivelul celor de la Ferrari, ar fi fost mai rapizi pe un tur atat in cursa cat si in calificari. Deci cu acelasi tip de aripi si fara slil streamul lui Raikkonen ar fi fost in jurul a jumatate de secundam chiar si mai bine. Nu cred ca pot pierde la Monza atat de mult doar din motor si Ferrari sa castige atat de mult din noul motor, care la Haas nu a facut nici o diferenta cursa aceasta.